2010年11月9日 星期二

Packaging Research: Background to Packaging

Packaging Research: Background to Packaging

Introduction

According to the World Packaging Organisation (WPO), globally the packaging material and machinery industry is estimated to be worth $US 500 billion per year, representing between 1-2% of the GDP in industrialised countries. An estimated 100,000 packaging manufacturing companies employ in excess of 5 million people and, in principle, serve all business sectors manufacturing and/or trading physical products.
Packaging technology has gone through a fast and significant development in recent decades, however the smartest developments are yet to be seen. Today's modern society depends to a large extend on the availability and use of modern packaging technology, comprising a vast variety of modern materials, high tech applications and smart operations. Modern packaging technology aims to meet a vast range of requirements ranging from providing food safety, via low cost storage and distribution, self-selling marketing, convenient consumer use to responsible waste management practices.
Thanks to modern packaging technology products can be economically distributed over large geographical areas or stored over time without unacceptable quality loss. Packaging is more than a clever way of combining materials. Adding value through the development of partnership relations in the supply chain seems to be the credo for the next decennium. Good packaging facilitates a subtle cooperation between product, packaging process and material with the objective of fulfilling needs of all stakeholders along the supply chain including the post-consumer waste manager.
Value chain management, product stewardship and life cycle management are considered key attributes that will drive the development of future, sustainable packaging systems. Such systems will need to go far beyond the current waste minimisation driven principles of reduce, re-use, recycle, and recovery. Packaging systems that will minimise impact on the environment, will seamlessly meet social requirements and expectations, and will be economically effective are the business winners of the future.

Drivers for development

Today's companies in the packaging supply chain are faced with acknowledging, understanding, addressing and managing a range of issues affecting the sustainable use of packaging. Issues include the use of renewable and non-renewable resources, recyclability, regulations, and material and transport costs. Ongoing demographic and life-style changes, technology changes, environmental issues (in particular as recognised by legislation and/or voluntary agreements in numerous countries), consumer dynamics, and supply chain demands are important factors of influence for the packaging supply chain. Adequately responding to such issues requires pro-activity, progressivism and agility from packaging manufacturers as well as users.
Despite the industry becoming more progressive and pro-active in its approach and seeking shared responsibility, the majority of the actions are still undertaken on the basis of the traditional 4-R waste management hierarchy (Reduce, Re-use, Recycle, Recover, Dispose) rather then evaluating and assessing the life cycle impacts and developing strategies to reduce impact. As a result 'down gauging' and 'recyclability' are still the main drivers in avoiding environmental impact.
There is little doubt that this approach will lead to a reduction of impacts in the short term. It may take the existing 'waste fat' out of current packaging systems but does not take into account the need to reduce overall environmental impacts in a substantial way. It also fails to address the increasing need for packaging systems that meet requirements from new distribution systems, increasing demands for product convenience, increasing consumer differentiation and so on.
In the longer term this approach will not be sufficient and will fail to provide adequate solutions. Numerous problem areas will emerge that will require a rigorous overhaul of the use of packaging systems in order to meet ongoing commercial demands.
Particularly for fast moving consumer goods, such as food products, the packaging is one of the key product components that can provide a commercial advantage over competing products. Hence, the packaging is of significant commercial importance for the economical sustainability and growth of businesses. There is little value in arguing the need for less packaging while economic growth is predominantly driven by diversification of markets and subsequent product variations. Key challenges for future business growth and development are:
  • The ability to meet supply chain and market requirements in terms of distribution efficiency, marketing power, consumer safety and convenience, and environmental performance;
  • To maintain high levels of flexibility for creating commercial advantage through value added packaging systems;
  • To maximise the triple bottom line performance in order to satisfy both commercial stakeholders (shareholders, customers) and community stakeholders (government, consumers, NGOs);
These challenges cannot be successfully tackled with the traditional 4-R approach. A holistic, integrated and collaborative initiative involving the entire supply chain is essential to be able to create step change improvements. The focus should not be on how the supply chain can reduce the amount and increase the recycling of packaging used but on how it can sustainable satisfy the economic, social and environmental requirements for packaging related to the production, distribution and consumption of products in order to further enhance the well-being of our society.

What makes a Packaging?

Of course, in principle a packaging (system) is just a clever way of constructing a container out of a selected material or combination of materials. A wide variety and choice is available, and selection is not an easy job.
A range of parameters, varying from product characteristics to consumer (client) requirements and trends, affect this selection. These parameters can be grouped in three categories as is illustrated in figure 1:
  • Parameters in the micro or product environment
  • Parameters in the ambient or distribution environment, and
  • Parameters in the macro or market environment
Box Diagram
Figure 1: Interaction of a packaged food product with the environment
(Source: Kooijman, 1996)
The parameters in the macro environment are constantly subject to change and have, to a certain extend, an effect on the ambient environment (e.g. a change in distribution method can have an impact on mechanical impacts exerted on the packaging system).
Because of this dynamic environment, packaging systems are continuously due to optimisation, a permanent search for the optimum between functionality and cost. This value analysis includes relating the packaging system's technical, economical and environmental performance to requirements from product, manufacturing and packaging process, warehousing and distribution, retailing and marketing operations, consumer demands and behaviour, and post-consumer waste management.
Meeting this complex of varying and often opposing demands is obviously not an easy task and requires a thorough understanding of issues involved and ability to balance them in anticipation on the pull of a changing market. Packaging research and education can and will support the packaging chain in their efforts to evaluate the complexity of demands and create adequate solutions. Packaging Research
Research in the packaging area can principally be distinguished into three main areas:
  • Strategic Research
  • Applied Research
  • Fundamental Research
Strategic research has a focus for new approaches in the packaging domain. It aims at identifying new pathways for advancing the future of packaging. Strategic research is essential to identify and understand future issues, to identify potential solutions (being it technological, organisational or managerial), and to design routes for implementation.
The packaging domain cannot advance without a substantial strategic research being undertaken. As in every other discipline novel approaches are essential to achieve effective future packaging solutions. However, the extensive complexity of the field due to its multi-disciplinarity and material variety, its range of stakeholders, and its broad mix of functions, makes strategic research indispensable for the packaging domain.
On an individual member basis and, even more relevant, by collaboration between members, IAPRI is well positioned to undertake this type of research. By combining academic with industry focussed research strengths, IAPRI is able to provide unique sets of research skills to assist both industry and government stakeholders in the strategic advancement of packaging.

Applied research is considered the historical scene of packaging research and has often focussed on specific problems concerning packaging intensive products. The challenge ahead lies in the conversion of disciplinary and/or technological advances achieved in other areas (e.g. microelectronics) to the packaging field. Particularly in advancing packaging towards active, smart and intelligent systems able to interact at different points and with various stakeholders along the supply chain, significant applied research is required.
Often this type of research involves development of 'proof of concept' and 'route to market' and is therefore likely to be undertaken in close cooperation with commercial entities. Most IAPRI member organisations are well experienced in conducting this type of research. However, each member will have limitations in its scope of research for which reason collaboration between two of more members might be preferable to cover a particular applied research project.
Fundamental research focuses on developing the underlying sciences for packaging material applications and technologies. This area belongs historically to the discipline areas. Fundamental research in the packaging domain historically has focussed on understanding material and packaging system behaviour. Interaction of packaging materials in contact with product (e.g. food or dangerous good) is an example of such research. Mathematical modelling of the dynamic behaviour of packaging cushioning materials is another example.
Fundamental research is often the domain of research students and is an important part of generating research staff for packaging research organisations. Most IAPRI members, being either University entities or having collaborative links with relevant university entities, are involved in this kind of research.
本文是關於運輸包裝的設計實例,文章中涉及的尺寸和價格均為估算值,而且只是針對固定的包裝供應商所做的方案,僅作參考。

  一、背景簡介
   該產品為出口到=日=本=的一款馬達,加工企業在這個項目中需要對包裝進行成本上的控制,同時又要獲得客戶方的認可, 162mm * 162mm * 238mm , 5kg ,包裝不要求回收。 
  二、設計任務
   1、 40 尺的集裝箱裝運,盡可能地利用空間;
   2、托盤化運輸操作,避免人工搬運;
   3、每箱不得超過1000kg ;
   4、馬達必須豎著放。

  三、設計思路
   綜合上述任務要求,為方便再加工取用,採用集合包裝比較適宜,為了最大化內部空間利用率和不超過1000kg 的要求,產品6*6*4=144 的排列,選擇1100mm * 1100mm * 120mm 的托盤,整個運輸單元1120mm 的高度,正好堆放兩層,採用材質較好的紙箱就能夠符合保護要求,而且=日=本=這個國家在包裝上偏好用紙材料。
   (1) 考慮到海運出口, 操作安全規範的周轉環境下, 安全係數應不低於3 ,太高又浪費;
   (2) 內部的結構也可以提高承重功能,問題集中在紙板的性能上,體現紙板性能的數據來自兩個:耐破強度和邊壓強度。 這將作為選配材質的主要依據。

  四、方案解說
 

   1、膠合板托盤;
   2、圍板;
   3、底板和蓋板;
   4、夾檔1 ;
   5、夾檔2 ,和夾檔1 組合成產品隔間;
   6、夾檔3 ;
   7、夾檔4 ,和夾檔3 組合將馬達托起;
   8、 PE 袋,厚8s 即可,每個產品一個,用作防塵,共計144 個; 
   9、PET 打包帶,井字結構;
   10、 隔板, 3 片,分割為四層。

  以下重點介紹材質配製的步驟和依據

  第一步:設定安全係數 
  因為貨櫃出口,則設定溫濕度變化導致紙箱抗壓減低率為60%, 設定裝卸過程導致的減低率為20% , 則粗略的計算安全係數
  K=1/(1-0.6)(1-0.2)=3.125
  內襯也能起到一部分支撐作用, 故綜合安全係數設定為 3

  第二步:推數抗壓強度
  根據抗壓設計公式P=G ×( n-1 ) × K 
  則該款紙箱的抗壓值應為: P=740 × (2-1) × 3= 2220kg ( 21756N ) 

  第三步:根據抗壓強度推算公式反推出紙板邊壓強度
  根據尺寸可知周長為1.078m ,根據楞型可知紙板厚度為0.0065m ,已知紙箱抗壓要求為4983N ,則代入紙箱抗壓推算公式:B=5.874 × E × (T × C)1 /2
       21756=5.874 × E × (2.2 × 0.014)1/2 
       ECT=21097 N/m ,
  則紙板的用紙配置必須達到21097N/m 的邊壓才能滿足該紙箱的要求。

  第四步:最後確定合理的用紙配置 
  根據邊壓強度公式,紙板的楞型,工廠原紙的橫向環壓強度參數確定。
  瓦楞紙板的邊壓強度等於組成紙板各層原紙的橫向環壓強度之和。 
  其中對於楞紙,其環壓值為原紙環壓強度乘以對應的瓦楞的楞率。
  單瓦楞紙板Es= ( L1+L2+r × F) 
  雙瓦楞紙板Ed= ( L1+L2+L3+r × Fr+r1 × F1)
  三瓦楞紙板Et = ( L1+L2+L3+L4+r × Fr+r1 × F1+r2 × F2)

楞型

A

B

C

E

楞率 r

1.56

1.42

1.48

1.34

瓦楞厚度

4.5

3.0

4.0

1.8

  式中表示:
   L1 、 L2 、 L3 、 L4 分別為瓦楞紙板面紙、裡紙及中隔紙的環壓強度( N/m )
   r 、 r1 、 r2 分別表示瓦楞的楞率(以公司實際數據為準)
   F 、 F1 、 F2 分別表示芯紙的環壓強度( N/m )
   備選的材質

代碼
定量
耐破指數
(Kpa.m2/g)
橫向環壓強度
(N/M)
M
360
2.8
3816
A
250
2.5
2125
G
200
3.6
2100
R
150
18
1161
@
180
25
1612

  圍板7 層紙板 
  初選@ 芯紙,但後來了解到高克重芯紙需要預定而且起定量要求5T/ 次,門幅種類少,沒有符合圍板990mm 的生產走紙要求,故選擇了B 芯紙,常用/適用性廣/ 門幅齊備,但性能稍低於@ 紙。 這樣的話,就必須在箱板紙上來平衡綜合性能以達到邊壓要求。 箱板紙中,M 克重高,耐破和環壓性能好,相對其他材質更有抗潮方面的優勢,在中間的幾層選擇比較適中的A 紙來合理控製成本,同時又不影響生產設備的高效運作。 
  MBABABM 
  •  三瓦楞紙板ETt = ( 3816+2125+2125+3816+1.56 × 1161+1.48 × 1161+1.42 × 1161) 
  •  =20989 N/m 
  接近要求的邊壓強度,而且都是常備用紙,性能穩定,生產部和品管的反饋確認了這樣的配備可行,且有做過這樣配置的產品。
  蓋5 層紙板 
  從包裝結構中可以看到, 蓋子要直接承載重量, 需要比較強的平壓強度和耐破強度.B 芯紙,M 為箱板紙, MBMBM 。
  夾檔5 層紙板,選用常用的紙板GBGBG 。 
  五、案例總結 
  整個運輸包裝單元約300元,低於預算值,結構簡單,操作簡便。作者:楊成偉